ADDENDUM TO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04145
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: YES
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
1. His Primary Air Force Specialty Code (PAFSC) of 95A0 (USAF
Admissions Liaison Officer) be changed to reflect 17D3 (Cyber
Operations).
2. He be given supplemental promotion consideration to the grade of
Lieutenant Colonel (Lt Col, 0-5) for cycles V0510B in 2010 and
V0511B in 2011.
3. His Promotion Recommendation Forms (PRF) for the promotion
boards referenced above, be re-accomplished by his senior rater with
a consideration of changing the overall recommendation to Definitely
Promote (DP).
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 21 Jun 2012, the Board considered and denied a similar appeal.
For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the
applicants request and the rationale of the earlier decision by the
Board, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit I (with Exhibits A
through H).
In an undated letter, the applicant submitted a request for
reconsideration. He states that the new evidence he provides
directly supports the core of his argument and was obtained through
a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request. In the request, he
asked the Air Force to clarify the use of Reporting Identifier (RI)
95AO as an officer's PAFSC. The Air Force Military Classification
Development Branch (AFPC/DPSIDC), stated that RI 95AO cannot be
assigned as an officer's PAFSC. Therefore the Officer Selection
Briefs (OSB) considered by the promotion boards had a negative
impact on his promotion opportunities. Air Force Board for
Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR) case, Docket Number BC-2002-
02848 had similar facts wherein the PAFSC was not correct and
negatively impacted the officer's promotion.
In support of his appeal, the applicant provides a personal
statement, copies of a FOIA response, electronic communiqués, U.S.
District Court Opinion and AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2002-02848.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit
J.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. After again reviewing this application along with the additional
documentation provided in support of his appeal, we do not believe
the applicants PRFs should be changed. We note the applicants
PAFSC was incorrectly listed on his officer selection brief when his
records met the CY10 and CY11 Line and Health Professions Lt Col
Promotion Boards. However, as previously pointed out by ARPC/DPB in
their memorandum dated 4 May 2012, when requesting a change or
correction to a PRF, new PRFs signed by the senior rater of record
when the original PRFs were prepared and a memorandum explaining why
the PRFs are in error is required. Additionally, if applicable, the
memorandum should also explain why the senior rater believes the
applicants promotion recommendations should be changed from promote
to definitely promote. Should the applicant provide this information
we would be willing to reconsider his request. In view of the above
and in the absence of evidence to the contrary we find no basis to
recommend grating this portion of the applicants request.
2. Notwithstanding the above, sufficient relevant evidence has been
presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice to
warrant partial relief. In this respect, we note the applicant has
provided additional information from the Air Force Office of Primary
Responsibility (OPR) that corroborates his assertions that RI 95AO
should not be assigned as his PAFSC. Therefore, we recommend his
PAFSC be changed as requested. The applicant also asserts, in
essence, that based on the error with his PAFSC that his appeal is
similar to AFBCMR BC-2002-02848 and that relief is warranted using
the same rationale for an SSB. We agree. While it cannot be stated
with certainty the error with the applicants PAFSC caused his
nonselections for promotion, we believe any uncertainty regarding
the effect of this error should be resolved through the SSB process.
Therefore, to avoid the appearance the applicant did not receive
fair and equitable promotion consideration with a complete and
correct record we recommend his records be corrected to the extent
indicated below.
3. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not
been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel will
materially add to our understanding of the issue(s) involved.
Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that the Officer
Selection Brief viewed by the Calendar Year 2010 (CY10) Line and
Health Professions Lt Col Promotion Selection Board (V0510B) and the
CYll Line and Health Professions Lt Col Promotion Selection Board
(V0511B) be corrected under the AFSC Data to change the PAFSC from
95AO to 17D3.
It is further recommended that he be considered for promotion to the
grade of Lt Col by a Special Selection Board for the CY10 Line and
Health Professions Lt Col Promotion Selection Board (V0510B) and the
CYll Line and Health Professions Lt Col Promotion Selection Board
(V0511B) and any subsequent boards in which the corrections were not
a matter of record.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 3 Feb 2014, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
All members voted to correct the record as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR BC-2011-
04145:
Exhibit I. Record of Proceedings, dated 13 Nov 2012,
w/Exhibits.
Exhibit J. Letter, Applicant, undated, w/atchs.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04145
His complete response, with attachment, is at Exhibit E. ________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ ARPC/DPD recommends denial of the applicant's request for a corrected OSB, and SSB consideration for CY10 and CY11 Lt Col Promotion Boards. According to AFI 36-2504, Officer Promotion Continuation and Selective Early Removal in the Reserve of the Air Force, Paragraph 9.2, only Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04693
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04639 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His nomination package for position vacancy be reviewed for eligibility for the Calendar Year 2010 (CY10) Line and Health Professions Lieutenant Colonel Position Vacancy (PV) Promotion Board. The complete AFPC/DPB evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03610
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03610 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. By letter, dated 23 Aug 11, the applicant was notified that In Accordance With (IAW) Title 10, United States Code (USC), §14506, on 1 Mar 12, he would be automatically transferred to the Retired Reserve because of his second deferral for...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-02848
He reviewed his record prior to the promotion board and at the time he had the understanding that his record was correct. After reviewing the evidence of record, we note that the applicant's PAFSC, as reflected on his OSB, was incorrect when he was considered for promotion by the FY03 major selection board. MICHAEL K. GALLOGLY Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2002-02848 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 04613
On 27 Mar 12, the AFRICOMs military personnel branch informed the applicant that ARPC/PBP determined his PRF was not considered by the CY11 Lt Col Reserve Promotion Board and of their actions to ensure the officer selection records of all eligible reserves are complete prior to promotion consideration. Therefore, we believe it appropriate to recommend that the OPR be corrected to reflect that the applicant acknowledged its receipt on 12 Jun 11, which will result in its inclusion in the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00009
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 6 July 2010, the applicant was awarded the Defense Meritorious Service Medal for Exceptional Meritorious Service for the Armed Forces of the United States. On 20 October 2010, the Missile Defense Agency awards manager amended the Military Personnel Award Order Number 2010-40, dated 7 July 2010, to read 29 June 2010 rather than 6 July 2010. On 1 March 2011, the applicant retired from the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 04553
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04553 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. His record be further corrected to account for his denied promotion opportunities to lieutenant colonel and colonel, in that he was not considered by promotion board for which he would have been eligible had he been accessed in the correct rank. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02656
___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that the attached AF Form 709, Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF), prepared for the Fiscal Year 2005 (FY05) Line and Health Professions Lieutenant Colonel Position Vacancy (PV) Promotion Selection Board, was accepted for file on 21 April 2004. It is further recommended that his record, to...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-03549
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-03549 INDEX CODE 131.01 135.02 COUNSEL: No HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded 144 extension course institute (ECI) points, the Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) for the Fiscal Year 2003 (FY03) Line and Health Professions Lt Colonel Position Vacancy (PV) Selection Board be replaced and he be...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03469
The applicant fails to recognize that the PRF is not the only record which documents performance within the Officer Selection Record (OSR) at the time of CSB promotion consideration. The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit B. AFPC/DPSOO recommends denying the applicants request for direct promotion to the grade of Lt Col; however, they support Special Selection Board (SSB) consideration in order for the applicant to write a letter to the CY2011A Lt Col CSB highlighting...